Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Ember gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is just a bit better than TCL 10 Pro, with a 78.5 score against 72.1. The Motorola One Action is a just a little bit lighter phone than the TCL 10 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola One Action and TCL 10 Pro have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Motorola One Action has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. TCL 10 Pro features a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola One Action counts with a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The TCL 10 Pro has better battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One Action is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.