Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Ember gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. The Motorola One Hyper construction is just a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the same pixel density and a same size display. TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the TCL 10 Pro also has more RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light images. Motorola One Hyper has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
TCL 10 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 14% more battery size.
The Motorola One Hyper not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.