Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ember gray | Blue and Brown |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is much better than TCL 10 Pro, having a global score of 80.7 against 72.1. Despite of the fact that Motorola One Vision is older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's construction is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. Motorola One Vision's CPU is very similar to the TCL 10 Pro one, and although the Motorola One Vision has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger sensor.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. TCL 10 Pro features better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.