Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ember gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is better than the TCL 10 Pro, having an 80 score against 72.1. Although Motorola One Zoom and TCL 10 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, the Motorola One Zoom design is just a little heavier but also a little thinner than TCL 10 Pro. TCL 10 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
TCL 10 Pro features a much better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display. TCL 10 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Motorola One Zoom costs a little more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.