Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Ember gray | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a 79.2 score against 72.1. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is incredibly newer and much thinner than the TCL 10 Pro's, but it is also just a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display and way more opaque screen. TCL 10 Pro has a way better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit longer battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.