Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Ember gray | Meteor grey |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the TCL 10 Pro were only released 6 months apart, Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the TCL 10 Pro. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little faster processor than TCL 10 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The TCL 10 Pro has a sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
TCL 10 Pro has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 744 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same video resolution, a 64 MP resolution camera, a 0.59 inches camera sensor and a F1.8 aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has faster 60 fps video frame rates.
TCL 10 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is way more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.