Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Ember gray | Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is slightly better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a 76.4 score against 72.1. Nokia 9 PureView's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, although it was released a little bit further than a year before. The TCL 10 Pro has a slightly better display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a way lower count of pixels in each display inch and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage, the TCL 10 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 37% more battery capacity. The TCL 10 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as TCL 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, otherwise you can save some money and get the TCL 10 Pro, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.