Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Ember gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Nokia XR20's design is newer than TCL 10 Pro's, but it is way heavier and thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and optimized performance.
The TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display and way more brightness. TCL 10 Pro and Nokia XR20 both have extremely similar CPUs, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot better video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor. The Nokia XR20 features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 has just a little bit longer battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 4630mAh battery size.
Nokia XR20 is more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.