Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ember gray | Sonic silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a little bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a 76.2 score against 72.1. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The nubia Red Magic 5S body is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the TCL 10 Pro. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more powerful processor than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM.
TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little bit higher pixel count in each display inch and way more brightness. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a 64 MP resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition. The TCL 10 Pro features a little longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 1% more battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as TCL 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can get TCL 10 Pro, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.