Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Ember gray | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a score of 83.1 against 72.1. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should count with the same operating system features. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is just a little thinner but a bit heavier than TCL 10 Pro, and they were released only 0 months apart.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has less bright screen, it also counts with a little bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater pixels amount in each display inch.
OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is just as good as TCL 10 Pro's camera, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.