Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 general score. Although Galaxy A30 is older than TCL 10 Pro, it's body is thinner and lighter. The TCL 10 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little larger screen.
TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the TCL 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has a 14% more battery size. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger sensor, a way higher video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.