Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A5 (2017) is a little bit better than TCL 10 Pro, having a general score of 75.8 against 72.1. The Galaxy A5 (2017) construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the TCL 10 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
TCL 10 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. TCL 10 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal storage. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.