Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than TCL 10 Pro, with a general score of 83.8 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is thinner and lighter than the TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released just 14 months before. The TCL 10 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
TCL 10 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos. TCL 10 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.