Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Ember gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than TCL 10 Pro, getting an 85.5 score against 72.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy A51's construction is a little lighter and thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, even though they were released with only 5 months difference.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better screen than Galaxy A51, although it has a quite worse display pixels density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display with the same size. Galaxy A51 has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. TCL 10 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger sensor, a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The TCL 10 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.