Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 general score. Galaxy A6's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than TCL 10 Pro, although it was released 2 years before. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more MP, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
The TCL 10 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 144 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. TCL 10 Pro features a way better battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A6 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.