Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2017) has a global score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Even though Galaxy A7 (2017) is way older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's design is just a bit lighter and thinner. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite greater pixel amount in each inch of display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite larger display.
TCL 10 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The TCL 10 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The TCL 10 Pro has a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 96 GB more internal memory. The TCL 10 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.