Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ember gray | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 92.9 against 72.1. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 operating system. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and the TCL 10 Pro were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is just a bit thinner but a bit heavier.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit more powerful processor than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro. They have the same camera aperture, a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a 0.59 inches camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
TCL 10 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.