Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Ember gray | Blue and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has an overall score of 78.4, which is a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro construction is incredibly thinner and a bit lighter than TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The TCL 10 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a little bit better display density, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit larger display. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a CPU that's very similar to TCL 10 Pro's CPU, and although the Galaxy C7 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The TCL 10 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The TCL 10 Pro features a way better battery duration than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.