Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Ember gray | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F41 and the TCL 10 Pro were only released 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy F41's design is just a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the TCL 10 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better looking display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger display and a really brighter screen.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a camera that is just as good as the TCL 10 Pro one, both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels and the same video frame rate. The Galaxy F41 has improved battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.