Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Ember gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a global score of 97.6 against 72.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features. The Galaxy Fold body is a lot heavier but notably thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little better performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Galaxy Fold features a superior memory for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The TCL 10 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
TCL 10 Pro features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.