Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Ember gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than TCL 10 Pro's score of 72.1. The Galaxy M20 is an older phone than TCL 10 Pro, but it is a little thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
TCL 10 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The TCL 10 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a much better 64 MP resolution, a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better captures in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a bit better battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.