Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is better than TCL 10 Pro, having an 82.4 score against 72.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Samsung Galaxy M30 is an older cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, but it is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. TCL 10 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M30 features a bit superior battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4550mAh.
TCL 10 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video, a way higher (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.