Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ember gray | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting an 85 score against 72.1. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features. Galaxy M40 is an older device than TCL 10 Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway.
TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a little bit lower display density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little larger screen. The TCL 10 Pro and the Galaxy M40 both have extremely similar CPUs, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The TCL 10 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy M40 features a little bit better storage for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M40 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The TCL 10 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.