Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a lot better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 87.7 against 72.1. Despite being the best in this review, we must tell that it is also just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should give identical OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit superior CPU than TCL 10 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. TCL 10 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy M51 has a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a way better battery duration than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.