Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Ember gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is way better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 72.1. The Galaxy Note 20 body is a bit thinner but a bit heavier than the TCL 10 Pro, and they were released only 3 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better screen density. The TCL 10 Pro captures better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also has faster 30 fps video frame rate, a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The TCL 10 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.