Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ember gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features and better performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and TCL 10 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is thinner but also heavier.
The TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite smaller screen and a little worse pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better videos and photos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The TCL 10 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 1% more battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.