Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much better than TCL 10 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 72.1. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is noticeably older than TCL 10 Pro, it's body is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy Note 3 and TCL 10 Pro count with extremely similar displays, although the Galaxy Note 3 has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower display pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
TCL 10 Pro has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. TCL 10 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.