Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older cellphone than the TCL 10 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it a little lighter and thinner anyway.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a little sharper display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The TCL 10 Pro has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.