Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The TCL 10 Pro features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal storage.
The TCL 10 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 42 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.