Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, having an 89 score against 72.1. Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than the TCL 10 Pro, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. TCL 10 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.