Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 score. Even though Galaxy Note3 is noticeably older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's construction is lighter and a little thinner. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. TCL 10 Pro counts with a better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little better display pixel density and a bit bigger screen.
The TCL 10 Pro features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
TCL 10 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments, a much bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.