Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a score of 80.2 against 72.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note5 is noticeably older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little lower display density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note5's processing unit is very similar to the TCL 10 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
TCL 10 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and a way better resolution back camera.
TCL 10 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.