Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Ember gray | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting an 83 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Note8's design is just a bit thinner than TCL 10 Pro, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
Galaxy Note8 has a little faster CPU than TCL 10 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. TCL 10 Pro has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
TCL 10 Pro has much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal memory. TCL 10 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a bit more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.