Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Ember gray | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is way better than TCL 10 Pro's score of 72.1. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S10 5G is older and just a little heavier than the TCL 10 Pro, it's design is still thinner. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a quite lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340px resolution. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10 5G is also cheap compared to the TCL 10 Pro, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.