Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Ember gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 400.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is way better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 score. Galaxy S10 Lite is a thinner and a little lighter device than TCL 10 Pro, even though they were only released 4 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen pixels density. TCL 10 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 1% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.