Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Ember gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a global score of 86.3 against 72.1. Galaxy S10e is an older phone than TCL 10 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit superior processing unit than TCL 10 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The TCL 10 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bigger display. Galaxy S10e has a bit more memory for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. TCL 10 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy S10e is a little more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.