Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ember gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 90.8 against 72.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Even though Galaxy S20 FE and the TCL 10 Pro were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy S20 FE construction is a little heavier but a little bit thinner.
The TCL 10 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit lower screen pixels density, they both have a display with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better CPU than TCL 10 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 1 percent more battery size. The TCL 10 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy S20 FE is more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.