Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Ember gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than TCL 10 Pro, with a 98 score against 72.1. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the TCL 10 Pro were released with only 2 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is just a bit thinner but also heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
The TCL 10 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little lower display density and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processor than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.