Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ember gray | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a lot better than TCL 10 Pro, having a 93.4 score against 72.1. Galaxy S22 is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the TCL 10 Pro. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy S22 has a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 counts with a better looking display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a way brighter display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a way worse 50 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and a lot higher video quality.
TCL 10 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.