Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Ember gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and a little thinner than the TCL 10 Pro's, but it's also heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, offering lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little better performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a much brighter screen, a quite bigger display, a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the TCL 10 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little longer battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.