Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-19 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 78.1 against 72.1. Galaxy S7 edge's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display.
TCL 10 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage. TCL 10 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
TCL 10 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.