Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ember gray | Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is better than TCL 10 Pro, with a general score of 81.9 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a older, heavier and a little bit thicker device than the TCL 10 Pro. Galaxy S8 Active has a display that's just as good as the TCL 10 Pro one, because although the Galaxy S8 Active has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S8 Active features a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
TCL 10 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S8 Active is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.