Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Ember gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 score. The Galaxy S9 is an older phone than TCL 10 Pro, but it's a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Galaxy S9 has a screen that is very similar to TCL 10 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy S9 has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features just a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 52 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S9 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.