Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is better than the TCL 10 Pro's score of 72.1. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, it must be told that it's also a notably thicker and way heavier cellphone. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro and TCL 10 Pro count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density. TCL 10 Pro features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better CPU than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. TCL 10 Pro has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity. The TCL 10 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way bigger sensor.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as TCL 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get TCL 10 Pro, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.