Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than TCL 10 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. TCL 10 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much better 64 MP resolution camera. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro costs a bit more money than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.