Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ember gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 400.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is way thinner and a little bit lighter than TCL 10 Pro, although both were only released with a few months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster processor than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. TCL 10 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit worse pixel density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
The TCL 10 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.