Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Ember gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's overall score of 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is newer and extremely thinner, but also heavier than the TCL 10 Pro. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior processor than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the screen.
The TCL 10 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.