Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black Shadow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| $ 400.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a 91.1 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is a lot heavier but incredibly thinner than the TCL 10 Pro. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The TCL 10 Pro features a very superior CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a slightly better screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen, a higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution and much more brightness.
TCL 10 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 4550mAh battery size instead of 4400mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as TCL 10 Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the TCL 10 Pro, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.