Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZs is slightly better than the TCL 10 Pro, having a 77.2 score against 72.1. The Xperia XZs design is lighter and thinner than TCL 10 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (although slower).
TCL 10 Pro features a little bit better screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen. The Sony Xperia XZs features just a bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor taking much lower quality photographs, a smaller aperture, a back camera with lot less mega-pixels and a lower (4K) video quality.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal memory. The TCL 10 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the TCL 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy TCL 10 Pro, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.