Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is a little bit better than TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 78.8 against 72.1. Even though Xperia Z4v is noticeably older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones use Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a bit superior CPU than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processor. Xperia Z4v has just a bit better looking display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The TCL 10 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The TCL 10 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Sony Xperia Z4v is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.